Can I be Convicted of a Drug Crime Even if I Have no Drugs on Me?

If the police conduct a lawful search and find drugs on your person – i.e., in your coat pocket – you can be charged with illegal possession of a controlled substance. However, even if you are not actually carrying any drugs, you may still be convicted of a crime if you had “constructive” possession of narcotics.

Constructive possession means that drugs are found in an area determined to be under your control.

The Elements of Constructive Possession

Constructive possession generally requires the state to prove two factors beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • You had knowledge that the drugs were present in the location they were found;
  • You had “immediate and exclusive” control over that area.

For example, say you live alone in an apartment. The police search the premises and find marijuana on the dining room table. It is a pretty safe bet you will be convicted of constructive possession even if you were not physically holding a joint. A jury can easily infer the drugs belonged to you.

However, what if you share an apartment with several other individuals? Suppose the police find cocaine stashed in a drawer in your roommate’s bedroom. In this situation, you are much less likely to be charged with constructive possession since there is no way to prove you had “immediate and exclusive” control of the drugs.

IL Court Reverses Conviction, 15-Year Prison Sentence in Constructive Possession Case

This is not to say that individuals are never wrongfully convicted of constructive possession. Recently, an Illinois appeals court reversed the conviction and 15-year prison sentence of a man charged with illegal possession of drugs and weapons. The court said there was “reasonable doubt” as to whether the defendant actually lived at the apartment where he was arrested.

One night in 2013, Chicago Police Department officers executed a search warrant at the apartment in question. The defendant was not present at the time. During the search, police found a hidden compartment inside of a hallway closet. Inside the compartment were drugs, firearms, cash, and assorted drug paraphernalia.

Outside the apartment, an FBI agent located and identified the defendant, who was sitting in his truck. The police arrested the defendant, even though he had no drugs on his person, and no contraband was found in his truck. The arrest was largely based on the presence of some of the defendant’s personal items in the apartment, including two prescription bottles and clothing.

The defendant elected for a bench trial without a jury. The trial judge found the defendant guilty. The Illinois First District Appellate Court agreed with the defendant, however, that the evidence was “insufficient” to support his conviction. Specifically, there was no evidence connecting the defendant to the apartment or the items recovered from the hidden compartment. The defendant did not have a key to the apartment, his personal items were not in the same room as the compartment, and no drugs were found on him or in his truck.

Have You Been Accused of a Drug Crime?

As this case illustrates, a drug charge can have serious consequences. No one should face 15 years in prison based on insufficient evidence. If you are facing a possession charge and need assistance from an experienced Orland Park criminal defense attorney, contact the Fotopoulos Law Office, today.

Source:

Illinois Official Reports

Can an Accuser Stop Me From Proving My Innocence?

Although television legal dramas might lead you to think the criminal justice system is infallible – the heroic police and prosecution always manage to catch the clearly guilty defendant – the reality is there are many people in Illinois sitting in prison for crimes they did not commit. In fact, the National Registry of Exonerations at the University of Michigan reports 195 wrongful convictions in Illinois – most of them from Cook County – have been identified and overturned since 1989.

Illinois Man Exonerated After Years in Jail

Defendants in sexual assault cases are especially vulnerable to false convictions based solely on the testimony of an unreliable accuser. An Illinois appeals court recently looked at whether or not an accuser may challenge a defendant’s actual innocence even when the state concedes there was a wrongful conviction.

The defendant in this case was convicted of rape in 2004. Nine years later, prosecutors moved to reopen the case, vacate the defendant’s conviction, and release him from prison. An Illinois judge granted the state’s petition and later issued the defendant a “certificate of innocence.” Such certificates clear a defendant’s criminal record and allow him or her to seek compensation from the state for wrongful imprisonment.

Although prosecutors did not oppose the certificate of innocence, the original accuser did. She filed a separate petition to vacate the defendant’s certificate. The state and the defendant both objected to this petition on the grounds the accuser lacked standing. The courts agreed.

The Illinois First District Appellate Court said the law does not permit accusers to challenge a certificate of innocence. Only the state may do that. Additionally, while the law does afford “victims” of crimes certain rights in legal proceedings involving their attackers, the accuser here was “no longer a victim,” since the trial court vacated the defendant’s conviction.

One reason the accuser was apparently so determined to challenge the certificate of innocence is that she is now a defendant herself in a federal civil lawsuit filed by the man she accused of rape. The First District noted the defendant “is seeking to admit his Illinois certificate of innocence” as evidence in his civil case to prove the accuser’s “alleged lies.”

Avoiding the “Sex Crimes Offender” Label

Ideally, a defendant is not convicted based on false or insufficient evidence in the first place. This can be difficult in a sexual assault prosecutions, where prosecutors and juries tend to be more sympathetic towards accusers. Even in a case where the evidence is the accuser’s word against that of the defendant, a jury may take the easy way out and decide to convict.

A sex crimes conviction of any type is especially damaging to the defendant, who may have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his or her life. Even after serving a prison sentence, a person convicted of sex crimes may have difficulty finding housing or employment. The stigma attached to such convictions is quite real.

This is why if you are accused of a sex crime, you need to take the matter seriously. Your first call should be to an experienced Orland Park criminal defense lawyer who knows to how to defend such cases. Contact the Fotopoulos Law Office to schedule a consultation with an attorney right away.

Sources:

Exoneration News

Illinois Official Reports

What to Do if in a Car Accident With an Uninsured or Underinsured Driver?

Getting into any type of car accident can be a very unpleasant experience. Depending on the situation, you could be facing extensive damage to your vehicle or even serious injuries to yourself or your passengers. If you are in an accident with a driver who is uninsured or underinsured, the complexity of your situation increases quite a bit. Every driver in the state of Illinois is required to have a certain amount of coverage for collisions that are their fault, but not every driver obeys that rule. According to a 2017 study from the Insurance Information Institute, around 13 percent of drivers in the United States did not have any type of car insurance. This can be problematic for everyone involved in an accident, especially if you are a victim.

Dealing With an Accident With an Uninsured Driver

Usually, when you are in a car accident, the insurance company of the driver who is found to be at fault pays for the costs associated with the accident. When you are in an accident with a driver who does not have insurance, it can become a problem when trying to get your own insurance company to pay for damages. Even if a driver does have insurance, they may not have the right amount of insurance or enough to cover the costs of the damages. If you have been in an accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver, here are a few things to keep in mind:

  1. You Should Immediately Call Emergency Services: Obviously, you should call 911 if anyone involved in the accident is seriously injured. However, it is always a good idea to call the police to the scene – even if there were no injuries – so that the accident can have an official record.
  2. Get the Other Driver’s Contact Information: If the motorist stops after the accident, you should ask them for their insurance information. They may or may not tell you if they have insurance, but even if they do not, you should get their contact information such as their name, address and phone number.
  3. Begin Gathering Evidence: This step can be crucial in any claim that involves an uninsured or underinsured motorist. You should collect as much evidence as you can when you are still at the scene of the accident. Try to take photos of any obvious injuries to yourself or others, any damage to your vehicles, their license plate number and vehicle, and the surrounding area.
  4. Consult with an Attorney Before Talking to Your Insurance Company: Before you contact your insurance company, you should contact an attorney. Your attorney will be able to provide you with all of the available options for obtaining compensation after your car accident, even if there was an uninsured or underinsured motorist involved.

Our Cook County Car Accident Injury Lawyers Can Help You Get the Compensation You Deserve

Getting into a car accident can be devastating, but things can be even more stressful when the other driver involved in the accident does not have insurance to cover your damages. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we know how difficult it can be to obtain compensation for your injuries, even in situations in which the other driver does have insurance. Our skilled Tinley Park, IL, car accident injury attorneys will work with you and your insurance company to help you get the most out of your claim. Call our office today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

Facts + Statistics: Uninsured Motorists

Tips for Handling an Accident With an Uninsured Driver

Five-Step Guide to Handling an Accident with an Uninsured Driver

Important Things You Should Know About Carrying a Concealed Weapon in Illinois

The right to own firearms is part of the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution and cannot be taken away by the government. However, lawmakers in each state have the authority to make their own laws pertaining to the use, sale, distribution, and ownership of firearms and to legally restrict certain people from owning one. In Illinois, owning a firearm is legal and even carrying a concealed firearm can be legal. If you are a firearm owner, there are a few things you should know about carrying a concealed weapon in Illinois.

You Must Possess the Proper Licensure

In the state of Illinois, if you want to carry a concealed weapon with you, you must first obtain both a firearm owner identification (FOID) card and a concealed carry license (CCL). Everyone in the state who owns a firearm must possess a FOID card, while only those who wish to carry a concealed weapon must also have a CCL. To be eligible for a CCL, there are a variety of requirements, such as:

  • Possessing a current and valid FOID card
  • Not being convicted of more than two DUI charges or misdemeanor or felony charges involving violence
  • Successfully completing the required firearms training

Carrying a concealed weapon without having a CCL or having it in your possession can result in serious criminal charges.

There are Certain Places You Cannot Carry a Concealed Weapon

Even though you are permitted to carry a concealed weapon once you have received your CCL, there are still certain places that you are prohibited from carrying a concealed weapon by Illinois law, including:

  • Schools, colleges, universities, and child-care facilities
  • City, county, and state government offices and related facilities
  • Hospitals and nursing homes
  • Public transportation and their related facilities
  • Bars and other establishments that mostly serve alcohol
  • Public playgrounds and parks
  • Casinos and racetracks
  • Stadiums and other facilities used for sporting events
  • Public libraries, amusement parks, zoos and museums
  • Areas where firearms are prohibited under federal law
  • Businesses and other properties that have “no firearms” signs posted

A Will County Weapons Charges Defense Attorney has the Knowledge You Need for Your Case

Any weapons charges you may be facing are serious; there is no such thing as a small weapons charge, especially when it comes to carrying a concealed weapon. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we understand the gravity of weapons charges and will fight to protect your future. With more than 15 years of experience defending clients from various criminal charges, our skilled Joliet, IL, weapons charges defense lawyer can help you with your case. To schedule a free consultation, call us today at 708-942-8400.

Sources:

About the Act

FAQs

Illinois Industries With the Highest Number of Non-Fatal Injuries

Since the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1970, the U.S. government has placed an increased focus on decreasing the number of injuries happening in workplaces across the country. Today, OSHA still pushes for workplace safety and adequate training and precautions to try to prevent as many workplace injuries as possible. Unfortunately, workplace injuries are still common. According to the latest information from the Illinois Department of Public Health, there were an estimated 132,400 workplace injuries recorded throughout the state in 2017. Though an injury can happen in any workplace, there are certain industries that have more workplace injuries than others.

  1. Health Care and Social Assistance: Most of the time, people think that the most dangerous industries to work in are those that use heavy machinery such as construction or factory work. In reality, the health care industry is typically the industry that has the highest number of workplace injuries. In Illinois, there were an estimated 21,300 injuries in this industry in 2017. Workplaces in this industry commonly include nursing and residential care facilities and hospitals.
  2. Manufacturing: While it is not the industry that has the most workplace injuries, manufacturing still ranks rather high when it comes to being hurt on the job. In 2017, an estimated 18,100 injuries occurred in manufacturing. This category covers most types of manufacturing, including plastics and rubber manufacturing, food manufacturing, textile mills, computer and electronic manufacturing and petroleum and coal products manufacturing.
  3. Retail Trade: Working in retail trade also has the possibility of being dangerous. An estimated 14,400 injuries were recorded in Illinois in 2017. The retail industry includes general merchandise stores, food and beverage stores, clothing stores and furniture and home furnishing stores. Many times, injuries recorded in this industry are overexertion, falls or trips.
  4. Transportation and Warehousing: The transportation and warehousing industry consists of nearly all types of transportation, such as air, water, rail and truck transportation, pipeline transportation, postal service and couriers and messengers. Around 10,900 injuries were recorded in this industry, with the majority coming from truck transportation.
  5. Entertainment and Hospitality: There is a wide range of workplaces that are included in the entertainment and hospitality industry, such as hotels, restaurants, bars, casinos, amusement parks, and museums. An estimated 10,700 injuries were recorded in 2017, with the foodservice industry carrying the majority of the injuries.

Have You Been Injured on the Job? A Cook County Workers’ Compensation Attorney Can Help

Being hurt while you are at work can change the course of your and your family’s lives forever. Not only can a workplace injury plunge you into financial distress, but you could also be facing the effects of your injuries for the rest of your life. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we will protect your interests at all times and aggressively pursue every source of compensation possible. If you have been hurt on the job, do not wait – call our skilled Tinley Park, IL, workers’ compensation lawyers today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

Survey of Occupational Injuriesand Illnesses in Illinois, 2017

Goods-Producing Industries

Understanding Field Sobriety Tests During Illinois DUI Stops

Before police even pull you over for a DUI stop, they will be watching your actions and the way you are driving to determine if a traffic stop is needed. The police officer will be looking for signs of alcohol impairment, such as failing to maintain proper lane position, speeding and braking problems, poor judgment and lack of vigilance. Once the officer believes they have enough evidence to initiate a traffic stop, they will pull you over and may ask you to step out of the vehicle. If the officer suspects that you might be under the influence of alcohol, they will ask you to complete a series of tests, which are called field sobriety tests. These can be standardized or non-standardized, although standardized field sobriety tests tend to hold up better in court because they have been extensively studied.

Standardized Tests

Standardized field sobriety tests have been studied and determined to be fairly accurate in determining if someone is impaired by alcohol. An officer will ask you to perform these tests during almost every traffic stop for suspicion of DUI. There are three types of field sobriety tests that are considered to be standard:

  • Horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN): During this test, the officer will be looking at the involuntary shaking of your eyeball as you gaze to the side, following the motion of the officer’s finger or pen. This is a phenomenon that occurs when people rotate their eyes at high peripheral angles but is exaggerated and occurs at lesser angles when a person is impaired by alcohol.
  • Walk-and-turn: This test involves you walking along a line on the ground while maintaining your balance and focus. The officer will ask you to take nine heel-to-toe steps, turn on one foot and return in the same manner. The officer will be watching to see if you can follow directions and how intact your balance is.
  • One-leg stand: During this test, you will be instructed to stand with one of your feet about six inches off of the ground, during which you will be asked to count out loud until the officer tells you that you can stop after about 30 seconds. The officer will be looking to see if you can balance without swaying, putting your foot down or using your arms to keep balanced.

Non-Standardized Tests

The type of tests that officers use typically depends on the specific police department they work for and that department’s policies. Illinois police have been known to use other non-standardized tests during DUI traffic stops, which you may be able to challenge in court. These tests include:

  • Alphabet Test: The officer will ask you to recite a portion of the alphabet. This test will start with a letter other than A and end with a letter other than Z.
  • Count Down Test: Similar to the alphabet test, you will be asked to count backward from a certain number to another number. For example, the officer can ask you to count backward from 47 to 32.

Our Cook County DUI Defense Lawyers Will Stand by You in Court

You have the right to refuse a field sobriety test. If you do agree to the test, there may be reasons other than intoxication that you performed poorly. Illinois has some of the strictest DUI laws in the country, which is why it is important that you contact a skilled Tinley Park, IL, DUI defense attorney if you have been charged with driving under the influence. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we will do whatever we can to get you the best outcome possible. Do not hesitate – call our office today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

Standardized Field Sobriety Test

Standardized Field Sobriety Testing One-Day Refresher

How the “Surveillance Location Privilege” can Compromise a Criminal Defendant’s Rights

The Constitution affords all criminal defendants, such as those facing drug charges, the right to “confront” the witnesses against them. This means that if you are arrested and charged with a crime, you have the right to cross-examine the arresting officer and any other prosecution witnesses at trial. However, law enforcement often tries to undermine a defendant’s right to confrontation by withholding information that might benefit the defense and undermine the prosecution.

Drug Conviction Reversed After Improper Invocation of Privilege

Some Illinois courts recognize what is known as a “surveillance location privilege.” This often comes up in the context of drug cases where a police officer on stake out claims to observe illegal activity. At trial, the prosecution then argues that the officer should not be required to disclose his or her “secret” surveillance location.

Although the Illinois Supreme Court has never expressly approved of the surveillance location privilege, the state’s intermediate appellate courts do. The privilege itself is not unlimited but rather must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Consider a recent example. In this case, the defendant was arrested, tried, and convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to nine years in prison. During pre-trial discovery, the defendant asked the prosecution to disclose the exact surveillance locations of the police officers who allegedly observed him engaging in a narcotics transaction. The state refused, citing the privilege, and the judge agreed that disclosure of the police officer’s surveillance location “would harm the public interest.”

The Illinois First District Appellate Court disagreed and reversed the defendant’s conviction. The burden is on the prosecution to justify the invocation of the privilege, the appeals court noted, which is generally done in a closed hearing in the trial judge’s chambers. The trial judge here did conduct such a hearing, but no transcript was made. The Appellate Court was therefore unable to review exactly “what evidence was presented” to determine if the prosecution, in fact, met its burden.

Beyond that, the First District also said the trial judge erred by not affording the defendant a chance to rebut the prosecution’s evidence in support of its privilege claim. A trial court is required to “balance the public interest in keeping the [surveillance] location secret against the defendant’s interest in preparing a defense.” Here, the Appellate Court said the trial court “abused its discretion” by failing to perform this constitutionally necessary balancing test.

Have You Been Charged With a Crime?

If you are facing a criminal charge and the possibility of spending several years in prison, it is essential that you have qualified representation. Speak with an experienced Orland Park criminal defense attorney. Contact the Fotopoulos Law Office, today.

Source:

Illinois Official Reports